Strategic B2B Content Marketing & Conversion Copywriting Hub

What we build (and how we keep it honest)

Most B2B sites don't have a writing problem. They have a decision problem: the page doesn't help a buyer choose.

Our strategy starts with a simple loop: measure intent, remove friction, then tighten the promise. During the rollout, we'll usually watch scroll depth, CTA click paths, and the "dead zones" where people hesitate. That's where copy earns its keep.

SEO Strategy

Technical SEO and content architecture that makes your best pages easier to find—and easier to trust.

Explore SEO Strategy

Conversion Copywriting

Homepage and landing page frameworks, UX writing, and message testing that improves above-the-fold decisions.

Explore Conversion Copywriting

B2B Content Marketing

Editorial strategy, email sequences, and content systems built for long sales cycles and multiple stakeholders.

Explore B2B Content Marketing

The common mistake: writing for approval instead of action

Here's the pattern we see on B2B teams: copy gets reviewed until it's "safe," then it stops converting.

Root cause

Approval-driven copy tries to satisfy everyone in the room. It stacks features, trims specificity, and avoids picking a lane. The buyer reads it and thinks, "Okay… but is this for me?"

On-page behavior analysis suggests the damage shows up early: short time-to-first-scroll, low interaction with proof sections, and CTA clicks that don't match traffic volume.

Fix (tactical, not theoretical)

1. Write one primary job-to-be-done at the top of the doc (not in the page). If reviewers can't agree, the page won't either.
2. Choose one proof type to lead with: numbers, named outcomes, or process transparency. Don't open with all three.
3. Make the CTA a commitment ("Get a teardown," "See the framework"), not a vague request ("Learn more").

Our deployment data indicates that when teams tighten the first-screen promise and align proof to one buyer concern, downstream sections get read more—not less.

Two ways to run content: campaign spikes vs. compounding systems

You can win with either approach. The difference is what you're optimizing for.

Approach A: campaign-led content

• Fast feedback loops (good for new offers)
• Clear attribution windows
• Easy to align with sales pushes

Approach B: system-led content

• Search visibility that builds over time
• Reusable page templates and briefs
• Less reinvention every quarter

Trade-offs we see in the field

Campaign content can look "successful" while quietly burning your team out. System content can feel slow until the architecture clicks. Based on our internal evaluations, the best results come when you pick one primary engine for about 90 days, then layer the other on top.

Recommendation

Start system-led if you already have product-market fit and a stable ICP. Start campaign-led if you're still learning which promise actually lands. Either way, keep one constraint: every piece must point to a decision.

Who's behind hdcopywriting

We're a small team. That's on purpose. It keeps the feedback loop tight and the writing grounded in what pages actually do in the wild.

Lauren Whitaker

Director of B2B Content Strategy

Focus: B2B content marketing systems, editorial planning, and long-cycle messaging that sales teams can actually use.

Marcus Delgado

Conversion Copywriting Lead

Focus: homepage and landing page frameworks, UX writing, and message testing for higher-intent clicks.

Ethan Caldwell

Senior SEO Strategist

Focus: SEO strategy, technical audits, and content architecture tied to measurable search demand.